Page 16 - Layout 1
P. 16

MEDICAL YEAR
            IN REVIEW




        An Observation on the Evolution


        of Community Oncology



          By Shruti Sharma, DO

        T      he practice of community oncology has evolved significantly   considered upon enrollment of clinical trials. Academic centers can


               in the last ten years. The general focus of community oncology
                                                               also provide increased supportive services to patients more readily at
               was primarily to bring accessibility of cancer care treatment
                                                                Independent organizations have also flawlessly implemented aca-
        to patients while academic oncology focused largely on specialty and   their community site.
        sub-specialty oncology services, research and being the powerhouse for   demic procedures and have continued to provide rich resources for pa-
        education and training programs. We largely associated clinical trial   tients. As we continue to learn from the research being conducted by
        availability with academic oncology and looked to them for additional   these clinical trials, independent organizations have continued to en-
        resources, including research laboratories, libraries and access to exclu-  courage community oncologists to become private investigators and
        sive research databases.                               establish leadership roles to ensure that patient care is never compro-
          It has been stimulating to see the evolution of community on-  mised and remains inclusive. Some comprehensive cancer cen-
        cology to include procedures that were traditionally              ters also consist of surgery and radiation services within
        observed only at academic institutions. Many on-                      the same organization, which allows for continu-
        cologists have started to develop “special fo-                           ity of care and accessible communication
        cuses” instead of remaining as a general                                  among patient treatment teams.
        oncology physician. Furthermore, com-                                         As research continues to produce re-
        munity hospitals have started investing                                      sults, the knowledge gained from these
        in graduate medical education pro-                                            studies keeps academic oncologists,
        grams, which subsequently has allowed                                         community oncologists and pharma-
        for the development of community-                                             ceutical companies busy, so we can
        based hematology and oncology fel-                                            continue to understand the mecha-
        lowships. Lastly, clinical trials and                                         nisms of malignant hematology and
        research protocols have been investi-                                        solid tumors and manufacture new
        gated and implemented avidly in the com-                                    drugs that can help combat these disease
        munity setting.                                                           processes. With all this vast knowledge, is it
          The mesh between community oncology                                   better for patient care, then, to “subspecialize” in
        and academic oncology has been beneficial to both                    oncology or remain a generalist in the community
        parties. Some community hospitals have decided to es-            going forward? Currently, some community practices en-
        tablish an affiliation to an academic center. Other organizations   courage oncologists to pick a few focuses to mold their practice into,
        have decided to remain independent but incorporate academic proce-  while many others still leave this decision up to the physician.
        dures within their structure. Is one structure better than the other? Not   Conclusively, we have observed significant change in this last decade
        necessarily.                                           regarding the structure of academic oncology and community oncol-
          Establishing an affiliation to an academic center allows for increased   ogy. As the relationship between community and academic oncology
        access to numerous clinical trials and research already established by   continues to evolve, the goal of both, however, remains unified: to pro-
        the academic institution, not necessarily available to independent   vide the best cancer care for our patients as close as possible to them.
        standing community programs. Furthermore, the reputation obtained
        upon affiliation to an academic institution helps increase awareness of   Shruti Sharma, DO. She is a Medical Oncologist and Hema-
        the community program itself. In addition, this relationship allows di-  tologist at Texas Oncology, San Antonio Medical Center and a
        versification of enrollment into various trials. Gender, age, race and so-  member of Bexar County Medical Society.
        cioeconomic status of individuals are all factors that need to be



         16     SAN ANTONIO MEDICINE  • December 2022
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21