Page 30 - Layout 1
P. 30

FEATURE

Raising Standards for Accountability:

           IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSPARENCY LAWS FOR
          DISCLOSURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER DATA

                                 By Ammar Navid Saigal, B.A. (Hons), M.P.H., M.D. Candidate (2018)
                             University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio School of Medicine

  Early distribution of protection protocols related to environmen-        spective analyses have repeatedly demonstrated that implementing
tal disasters is a critical preemptive measure to limit the associated     new systems of disclosing epidemiological data into law is an urgent
adverse impact on society. Countless examples exist of population-         need for the purpose of adequate disaster containment and relief.[3]
wide catastrophes resulting from negligent human behavior; how-            Legislation directing efforts to disseminate knowledge to the public
ever, appropriate disclosure of data to the masses detailing these         has emerged in recent history as a force for raising national account-
calamities was often lacking.[1] In order to achieve the highest stan-     ability during environmental crises.[6]
dards of transparency within healthcare, agencies responsible for
collection of environmental disaster morbidity statistics must ensure        The water-poisoning crisis of Flint, Michigan is the most obvious
the distribution of qualitative, factual, and preventive guidance to       instance in recent memory of failure of transparent disclosure. The
the public. Health professionals bear an ethical obligation to advo-       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was authorized
cate for the passing of legislation that will require timely, appropriate  to initiate counter-measures against childhood lead poisoning via
disclosures to be made in the event of environmental disaster. The         passage of the Lead Contamination Control Act of 1988.[8] One
enactment of transparency laws will lower the burden of financial          of the CDC's responsibilities in this endeavor was to screen children
expense and mortality experienced during crises such as the lead           for the development of lead poisoning. The absence of a well-pub-
toxicity of Flint, Michigan water or the insufficiency of failsafe         licized effort by the CDC to monitor blood lead levels in Michigan
measures that resulted in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Retro-          illustrates the lack of transparency by health authorities. The CDC’s
                                                                           response was not capable of identifying, giving

30 San Antonio Medicine • November 2017
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35