Page 31 - 0215_SAM_FINAL
P. 31

BUSINESS OF
                                                                        MEDICINE

federal courts determine the guilt of accused criminals, resolve       TEXAS PERSPECTIVE
private law disputes between individuals, and review actions of          Every state does things in its own unique way regarding pub-
agencies enforcing civil laws — like public health laws. In general,
the lower courts follow the decisions of higher courts, and state      lic health law, especially as the law relates to public health emer-
courts review the state’s laws to determine if they violate the state  gencies. While you don’t need to be a scholar in Texas public
or federal constitutions. Federal courts review the constitutionality  health law, having a basic idea of available Texas resources is
of state and federal laws, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions      critical. One of our favorite resources is the Community Pre-
bind all state and federal courts.                                     paredness section of the Texas Department of State Health
                                                                       Services (www.dshs.state.tx.us/commprep). This site is very user
EMERGENCY SCENARIO                                                     friendly and contains a tremendous amount of source material
  The federal courts and most of the state courts use common           and background publications. Another great source is the Uni-
                                                                       versity of Houston Law Center’s Health Law and Policy Insti-
law precedent — which is critical, especially when it comes to de-     tute’s bench book designed for judges, entitled Control
cisions that impact public health matters. That precedent estab-       Measures and Public Health Emergencies
lished by some decision will then bind us in terms of what we can,     (www.law.uh.edu/healthlaw/#). This book provides a compre-
or cannot, do in a public health emergency scenario. Probably the      hensive summary and simplifies public health law, federalism,
most important public health legal opinion was in the case of Ja-      executive branch authority in Texas, and judicial authority in
cobson vs. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). This 1905 U.S.           Texas, regarding public health emergencies. Finally, all physi-
Supreme Court case (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/get-         cians should be familiar with the City of San Antonio’s Metro-
case.pl?court=US&vol=197&invol=11), concerned an order                 politan Health District website, and specifically its link at
based on state statute compelling vaccinations of residents against    www.sanantonio.gov/Health/EmergencyManagement.aspx,
small pox after a recent outbreak in Massachusetts. The Cam-           which has important contact information for reporting public
bridge Board of Health ordered the vaccinations, and Henning           health emergencies. We hope these resources will be a help to
Jacobson refused the vaccination and refused to pay the $5 fine.       you when facing an everyday, or unusually daunting, public
The U.S. Supreme Court decided that “Upon the principle of             health challenge.
self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right
to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the                           Joseph B. Topinka, JD, MBA, MHA, LLM,
safety of its members.”                                                                     FACHE, FHFMA is a recently retired military
                                                                                            attorney whose focus is on health law. He previ-
  With its decision in support of the law, the U.S. Supreme Court                           ously was an assistant professor in the Army-Bay-
began our modern constitutional approach to disease control law,                            lor Graduate Program in Health and Business
which includes the:                                                                         Administration, and has taught as an adjunct
                                                                                            professor at several local universities.
• Use of police powers for public health concerns;
                                                                                               Dana A. Forgione, PhD, CPA, CMA, CFE is
• Delegation of certain authorities to health agencies and other                            the Janey S. Briscoe Endowed Chair in the Business
   government subdivisions; and                                                             of Health at the University of Texas at San Antonio.
                                                                                            He is also an adjunct professor in the School of
• Use of actions limiting liberty for well-established public                               Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,
   health interventions.                                                                    the Department of Pediatrics, and in the School of
                                                                                            Public Health, all at the University of Texas.
  More importantly, the Jacobson case addressed the balancing
of public good vs. individual rights — a concept that physicians
and healthcare leaders must address as we face future public health
matters.

                                                                       visit us at www.bcms.org 31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36