Page 31 - 0215_SAM_FINAL
P. 31
BUSINESS OF
MEDICINE
federal courts determine the guilt of accused criminals, resolve TEXAS PERSPECTIVE
private law disputes between individuals, and review actions of Every state does things in its own unique way regarding pub-
agencies enforcing civil laws — like public health laws. In general,
the lower courts follow the decisions of higher courts, and state lic health law, especially as the law relates to public health emer-
courts review the state’s laws to determine if they violate the state gencies. While you don’t need to be a scholar in Texas public
or federal constitutions. Federal courts review the constitutionality health law, having a basic idea of available Texas resources is
of state and federal laws, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions critical. One of our favorite resources is the Community Pre-
bind all state and federal courts. paredness section of the Texas Department of State Health
Services (www.dshs.state.tx.us/commprep). This site is very user
EMERGENCY SCENARIO friendly and contains a tremendous amount of source material
The federal courts and most of the state courts use common and background publications. Another great source is the Uni-
versity of Houston Law Center’s Health Law and Policy Insti-
law precedent — which is critical, especially when it comes to de- tute’s bench book designed for judges, entitled Control
cisions that impact public health matters. That precedent estab- Measures and Public Health Emergencies
lished by some decision will then bind us in terms of what we can, (www.law.uh.edu/healthlaw/#). This book provides a compre-
or cannot, do in a public health emergency scenario. Probably the hensive summary and simplifies public health law, federalism,
most important public health legal opinion was in the case of Ja- executive branch authority in Texas, and judicial authority in
cobson vs. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). This 1905 U.S. Texas, regarding public health emergencies. Finally, all physi-
Supreme Court case (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/get- cians should be familiar with the City of San Antonio’s Metro-
case.pl?court=US&vol=197&invol=11), concerned an order politan Health District website, and specifically its link at
based on state statute compelling vaccinations of residents against www.sanantonio.gov/Health/EmergencyManagement.aspx,
small pox after a recent outbreak in Massachusetts. The Cam- which has important contact information for reporting public
bridge Board of Health ordered the vaccinations, and Henning health emergencies. We hope these resources will be a help to
Jacobson refused the vaccination and refused to pay the $5 fine. you when facing an everyday, or unusually daunting, public
The U.S. Supreme Court decided that “Upon the principle of health challenge.
self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right
to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the Joseph B. Topinka, JD, MBA, MHA, LLM,
safety of its members.” FACHE, FHFMA is a recently retired military
attorney whose focus is on health law. He previ-
With its decision in support of the law, the U.S. Supreme Court ously was an assistant professor in the Army-Bay-
began our modern constitutional approach to disease control law, lor Graduate Program in Health and Business
which includes the: Administration, and has taught as an adjunct
professor at several local universities.
• Use of police powers for public health concerns;
Dana A. Forgione, PhD, CPA, CMA, CFE is
• Delegation of certain authorities to health agencies and other the Janey S. Briscoe Endowed Chair in the Business
government subdivisions; and of Health at the University of Texas at San Antonio.
He is also an adjunct professor in the School of
• Use of actions limiting liberty for well-established public Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,
health interventions. the Department of Pediatrics, and in the School of
Public Health, all at the University of Texas.
More importantly, the Jacobson case addressed the balancing
of public good vs. individual rights — a concept that physicians
and healthcare leaders must address as we face future public health
matters.
visit us at www.bcms.org 31